Quantcast

Betty's Blog

Timely Teacher Talk

Sponsored Links

New reason for sibling rivalry

It's all over the news that a study based on the I.Q. scores of Norwegian men proves that the oldest child in the family has a slightly higher I.Q. score than his younger siblings.  This gives brothers and sisters new grist for the arguing mill.  This study will probably be a plot line for all sorts of fall television shows.  It could be on everything from Two and a Half Men to Law and Order.  I'll bet the writers are just having a field day with this one!  Sisseroo, if you are reading this, I'm sure I will find an interesting comment from you.  After all, I am the slightly younger sister. :)

Experts have been split about whether birth order in a family affects intelligence. But after conducting the largest study of its kind, Norwegian researcher Petter Kristensen said the debate is over.

"We can dismiss the theory that (intelligence based on birth order) is not a true effect, that it is an artifact," he said.

Kristensen and his colleagues, reporting in Thursday's online version of the journal Science, also concluded it doesn't matter if you aren't really the first child. If an older sibling dies young and you end up first in the household, you'll be smarter.

The researchers looked at IQ scores in 250,000 men entering mandatory military service. They found a significant difference in IQ scores in 60,000 pairs of siblings, said Kristensen, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Oslo.

Even though the researchers looked only at men, Kristensen said previous studies say women are similarly affected by their birth rank in the family.

The study supports the theory that first born children receive more attention from their parents and have access to more resources than their younger siblings. The first child is usually on center stage, and parents try so hard to make sure everything is done right.  Conversations are often based on the child and his day.  Language skills play a large role on I.Q. tests.

There are obviously other ways to measure intelligence.  Studies like this one bother me because some people might take them too seriously.  Families have enough stress without adding new zingers for siblings to hurl when arguing.  Hopefully, educators won't come to expect less from younger brothers and sisters coming into their classrooms. 

Posted: Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:14 AM by Betty

Comments

MysteryTeacher said:

I'm sorry but I didn't feel that 3 points was significant.  If my oldest daughter's IQ is 180 (and it is) and my younger daughter's was 177, I don't think that is significant.  That is what they are talking about...a 3 point difference on average.  What a load of bull.  A significant difference would be 20 to 50 points.  That is not what they discovered.  I believe oldest children have the higher average score because they get one-on-one attention from their parents and other siblings do not.  Also, older sibs tend to teach their younger sibs and without the benefit of years of experience that the first child had from parents.

I know at our house, I was able to teach, talk to and play with my oldest daughter.  I taught her to read at age 2 because she was interested and I had the time.  When my second came 4.5 years later, I had to go to work to help my family out financially.  So, she had babysitters and daycares.  I was tired in the evenings and didn't have time to teach her the way her sister was taught.  That is sad.  However, the younger child is the successful career building child. She finished college in 3 years with honors!  My oldest child dropped out of college.  It was boring.  I will say that I am still proud of her.  She is a stay-at-home mommy with two beautiful girls of her own and they are both smart as can be.

# June 24, 2007 1:46 PM

Betty said:

You're right.  The media frenzy is over just a few points and seems meaningless to me too.  

# June 24, 2007 2:58 PM

sellen said:

The big problem with these IQ tests is that they don't measure the KINDs of intelligences that people can have. I am the big sister of three, and I can tell you that my younger siblings perceive me as being the "smart" one. I think it's because I am the only one who got an advanced education AND they heard from our mom growing up that they should be more like me. I didn't even know this until a few years ago and my sisters told me! I felt horrible about that! I happened to love school and I was good at it, but I'd kill to have one of my sisters' ability with numbers and attention to detail! The other sister has a lot of interpersonal intelligence that I sometimes wish I had more of. She is also very organized and sensible. So, I don't pay any attention to this kind of study, because we know that intelligence is multi-faceted.

# June 24, 2007 7:54 PM

MysteryTeacher said:

sellen, you are so right.  There are many kinds of intelligence.  I hate it that at school they only test for Verbal Written, Verbal Oral and Mathmatical in the gifted tests.  Sometimes, they check for Spacial.  However, that doesn't even begin to cover the areas of giftedness that  are out there.  We are not conserned with the WHOLE child.  Only the "school" part.

# June 25, 2007 7:57 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled.